ÓйØin contrast with µÄ¾ä×Ó·Òë ÇóÖú
it is equally absurd to claim these results were in contrast with the earlier results showing an identical observed effect.
Retire statistical significance ÎÄÕÂÀïÃæµÄÒ»¾ä»°£¬ÎҵķÒëÊÇ£º
1¡¢Í¬Ñù»ÄÃýµÄÊÇÕâ´Î½á¹ûÓëÏÈǰÑо¿½á¹ûÏà±È£¬ÏÔʾÁËͬÑùµÄ¹Û²ìЧ¹û¡£
2¡¢Í¬Ñù»ÄÃýµÄÊÇÕâ´Î½á¹ûÓëÏÈǰÏÔʾͬÑùЧ¹ûµÄÑо¿½á¹ûÐγɶԱȡ£
ÕâÁ½¸ö£¬×Ô¼ºÄò»×¼£¬showing¼°ºóÃæµÄÄÚÈÝÊÇÐÞÊÎthe earlyresults »¹ÊÇthese results£¿
Õâ¾ä»°ÔÚÕâ¸ö¶ÎÂäÖУ¬°Ñ¶ÎÂäÌù³öÀ´£¬¹©Óï¾³²Î¿¼¡£
It is ludicrous to conclude that the statistically non-significant results showed¡°no association¡±, when the interval estimate included serious risk increases; it is equally absurd to claim these results were in contrast with the earlier results showing an identical observed effect. Yet these common practices show how reliance on thresholds of statistical significance can mislead us (see ¡®Be warefalse conclusions¡¯)¡£
·µ»ØÐ¡Ä¾³æ²é¿´¸ü¶à
¾©¹«Íø°²±¸ 11010802022153ºÅ
ÉÄÜÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ±È½Ï¼òµ¥£¬×Ô¼ºÍ»È»Ïëµ½Óþä×ӽṹ³É·Ö¼ìÑéµÄ·½·¨·ÖÎö
it is equally absurd to claim these results were in contrast with the earlier results showing an identical observed effect.
claimºóÃæ¸úµÄÊÇÒ»¸ö¾ä×Ó
ÆäÖÐ these results×öÖ÷Óï
were ÊÇνÓï
±öÓïÄØ£¿
showingÈç¹ûÐÞÊÎthe earlier results £¬ÄÇô¾ÍûÓбöÓïÁË
ËùÒÔÎÒÑ¡ÔñµÄ·Òë½á¹ûÊÇ
¡°Í¬Ñù»ÄÃýµÄÊÇÕâ´Î½á¹ûÓëÏÈǰÑо¿½á¹ûÏà±È£¬ÏÔʾÁËͬÑùµÄ¹Û²ìЧ¹û¡£¡±£¬
Ó¦¸ÃÊǵڶþ¸öÒâ˼£¬wereÊÇϵ¶¯´Ê
×£¸£
... it is equally absurd to claim these results [were in contrast with the earlier results] showing an identical observed effect.
¡°Í¬Ñù»ÄÃýµÄÊÇ[, ¾¡¹Ü]Õâ´Î½á¹ûÓëÏÈǰÑо¿½á¹ûÏà±È[²î±ðÏÔÖø]£¬[µ«È´±»ÈÏΪ]ÏÔʾÁËͬÑùµÄ¹Û²ìЧ¹û¡£¡±