要三审了,审稿人意见很难回复
一审大修,二审小修,而且增加了4号审稿人,审稿意见不够具体,感觉很难修改,虫友们分析下怎么改...
Reviewer #4: The manuscript is not well-written and the current version is not appropriate for the journal. The reasoning of the study is not strong enough and I recommend author adding more information from available data in literature to enhance the integrity of the manuscript. I am not sure what the novelty of this study is. I recommend author adding more details. The manuscript does not have any special analysis regarding the topic. Also, please add a well-designed graphical abstract to the study.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
原来的2和3号已经推荐接收了,1号二审审稿意见为空,怀疑拒审了,所以增加了4号,但是4号是要我全文大改呀……而且也没说怎么改
,
我的一篇也是其他审稿人都接受了,始终一个审稿人说英语不行以及创新点描述不清
祝兄台科研精进事业有成!
基本拒绝了,换杂志吧
没润色?