前辈们 这样小修以后还会被拒吗
dear mr. g
your manuscript ,has been reviewed. the reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.
the reviews are in general favourable and suggest that, subject to minor revisions, your paper could be suitable for publication.please consider these suggestions, and i look forwards to receiving your revision.
reviewer(s)' comments to author:
reviewer: 1
comments to the author
although the short follow-up time and the lack of treatment information are insufficient for the study, it still has certain reference value for the risk assessment in patients.
这样小修以后还会被拒吗？主要是审稿人的意见没有明确指出有啥问题，而且他说的我都在讨论中写过了…
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
你可以在结论部分提一下 就说尽管the short follow-up time and the lack of treatment information are insufficient for the study，但你会在未来的研究中考虑这个问题，然后在response里也提一下这个想法，同时感谢这个审稿人的建议，感谢他让文章的内容更加完整，而且帮助你更好的展开后续研究。这样就行了
，
如果这样我觉得还是再看看自己写的，肯定哪里不对审稿人胃口了，检查一下，然后再调整和补充一些相关信息。礼貌的回复，应该没问题。加油
祝福