申诉后,是修改后重投还是让第三个审稿人仲裁?
Thank you for your email, I passed it on to the associate editor who handled your manuscript and have now received their response. We would be willing to consider a revised manuscript that clearly highlights the novel findings and differences between this work and your previous work. We would also require you to provide a point-by-point response to the reviewers comments along with the revised manuscript.
Should you instead wish to proceed with an appeal, we would be willing to grant one. However, this would require sending your original manuscript along with the reviewer reports and rebuttal letter to a senior appeal reviewer. They would be asked to provide a recommendation of whether or not your manuscript would be suitable for publication in Food & Function. Please note the decision made by the appeal reviewer will be final.
Please could you let me know if you would prefer to proceed with an appeal or submit a revised manuscript.
翻译 :谢谢你的邮件,我把它转给了处理你的手稿的副编辑,现在收到了他们的回复。我们愿意考虑一份修订的手稿,它清楚地突出了这部作品和你以前的作品之间的新发现和差异。我们还要求您对审稿人的评论和修订稿进行逐条回复。
如果你不想继续上诉,我们愿意同意。然而,这需要将你的原稿连同审稿人的报告和反驳信一起寄给高级上诉审稿人。他们将被要求提供一个建议,说明你的手稿是否适合在食品和功能出版。请注意,上诉审查员的决定将是最终决定。
请告诉我你是愿意继续上诉还是提交修改过的手稿。
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
给了机会就照做吧,继续上诉吉凶难说
您建议是 让第三个仲裁还是修改在重投,谢谢
,
修改过的稿子肯定比直接用现稿仲裁有优势啊
肯定是重投比较好,要是拿现在的稿子再去仲裁,那吉凶难料。编辑建议的是重新修改后再投,投的时候写个cover letter,表明新稿子与旧稿之间的区别,并把按照审稿意见逐条修改的部分说明,肯定是重投更有优势些