reviewer回信息了，但是有一段看不懂，有没有大神告诉我一下是什么意思啊，麻烦了
Having also seen the raw pleasantness data next to the normalised data, I would question the rationale for transforming the data. This seems to be an unnecessary step, looking at the raw data the result is the same but you would make no assumptions about normalising the data and given the small sample size with would seem to be more appropriate.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
This seems to be an unnecessary step, looking at the raw data the result is the same but you would make no assumptions about normalising the data and given the small sample size with would seem to be more appropriate.
上面这句话很难理解，特别是sample size 后面有一个with，有没有大神告诉我是什么意思
。
which
，
我也觉得是which，而不是with，应该是打错了