| ²é¿´: 830 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷ÕßÇå´¿»¨ÃÀÄн«ÔùËÍÄú 5 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
Çå´¿»¨ÃÀÄÐгæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
reviewer»ØÐÅÏ¢ÁË£¬µ«ÊÇÓÐÒ»¶Î¿´²»¶®£¬ÓÐûÓдóÉñ¸æËßÎÒÒ»ÏÂÊÇʲôÒâ˼°¡£¬Âé·³ÁË
|
|
| Having also seen the raw pleasantness data next to the normalised data, I would question the rationale for transforming the data. This seems to be an unnecessary step, looking at the raw data the result is the same but you would make no assumptions about normalising the data and given the small sample size with would seem to be more appropriate. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÌåÖÆÄÚ³¤±²ËµÌåÖÆÄÚ¾ø´ó²¿·ÖÒ»±²×ÓÔڵײ㣬ÈçͬÄãÃÇÒ»Ñù´ó²¿·ÖÆÕͨ½ÌʦæÇÒÊÕÈëµÍ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ΪʲôÖйú´óѧ¹¤¿Æ½ÌÊÚÃÇË®ÁËÄÇô¶àËùνµÄ¶¥»á¶¥¿¯£¬µ«»¹ÊÇ×ö²»³öÓîÊ÷»úÆ÷ÈË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Çå´¿»¨ÃÀÄÐ
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 69.8
- É¢½ð: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 25
- ÔÚÏß: 9.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2418875
- ×¢²á: 2013-04-15
- רҵ: Éç»áÐÄÀíѧ
|
This seems to be an unnecessary step, looking at the raw data the result is the same but you would make no assumptions about normalising the data and given the small sample size with would seem to be more appropriate. ÉÏÃæÕâ¾ä»°ºÜÄÑÀí½â£¬ÌرðÊÇsample size ºóÃæÓÐÒ»¸öwith£¬ÓÐûÓдóÉñ¸æËßÎÒÊÇʲôÒâ˼ |
2Â¥2019-01-25 16:36:01
3Â¥2019-01-25 16:43:48
±±ë½
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 373.3
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 217
- ÔÚÏß: 242.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1714555
- ×¢²á: 2012-03-24
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÐźÅÀíÂÛÓëÐźŴ¦Àí
4Â¥2019-01-25 21:29:54
Çå´¿»¨ÃÀÄÐ
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 69.8
- É¢½ð: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 25
- ÔÚÏß: 9.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2418875
- ×¢²á: 2013-04-15
- רҵ: Éç»áÐÄÀíѧ
5Â¥2019-01-26 12:29:00













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥