投稿到Top期刊的论文，返回意见是 修改后重审，录用机会大不大？具体意见如下：

Reviewer #1: This manuscript presents a strength reduction method based on Generalized Hoek-Brown criterion in slope stability analysis. Generally, this paper is well structured. However, the authors have not clearly shown what is novel in this work. In addition, this paper is missing some vital pieces of information leading to a large number of uncertainties during reading (and in evaluation). The detailed comments are as follows:
1.        The authors have not clearly shown what is novel in this work. For example, in Section 2.2, from Equations 1-15, what are your original contributions?
2.        Page 9, line 217, "According to commercial finite element program, each slope model is discretised into triangular or quadrilateral mesh." How about the commercial finite element program? What about the boundary/loading conditions? What are the input parameters?
3.        Page 9, line 219, "Through adjusting the parameters σci, GSI, mi and D, the slope is subjected to failure." How do you adjust these parameters? Besides these parameters, how about the other parameters of the commercial finite element program?
4.        In Section 3, how do you involve the strength reduction method into the commercial finite element program to simulate the slope critical failure state?
5.        How do you consider the global safety factor in the commercial finite element program?
Therefore, based on the above comments, the current work in this manuscript is unsuitable for publication in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. However, the authors are encouraged to resubmit their work after substantial/significant changes are made. 返回小木虫查看更多