24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2029  |  回复: 4

沧浪之水_

新虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 投稿到Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,返回意见是 修改后重审,录用机会大吗? 已有4人参与

投稿到Top期刊的论文,返回意见是 修改后重审,录用机会大不大?具体意见如下:

Reviewer #1: This manuscript presents a strength reduction method based on Generalized Hoek-Brown criterion in slope stability analysis. Generally, this paper is well structured. However, the authors have not clearly shown what is novel in this work. In addition, this paper is missing some vital pieces of information leading to a large number of uncertainties during reading (and in evaluation). The detailed comments are as follows:
1.        The authors have not clearly shown what is novel in this work. For example, in Section 2.2, from Equations 1-15, what are your original contributions?
2.        Page 9, line 217, "According to commercial finite element program, each slope model is discretised into triangular or quadrilateral mesh." How about the commercial finite element program? What about the boundary/loading conditions? What are the input parameters?
3.        Page 9, line 219, "Through adjusting the parameters σci, GSI, mi and D, the slope is subjected to failure." How do you adjust these parameters? Besides these parameters, how about the other parameters of the commercial finite element program?
4.        In Section 3, how do you involve the strength reduction method into the commercial finite element program to simulate the slope critical failure state?
5.        How do you consider the global safety factor in the commercial finite element program?
Therefore, based on the above comments, the current work in this manuscript is unsuitable for publication in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. However, the authors are encouraged to resubmit their work after substantial/significant changes are made.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cquzcl

银虫 (正式写手)

★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2018-09-20 08:58:26
这个都不好说,好好修改即可。。。。

我投的已经半年了,经历大修、小修,小修返回一个多月了,还在主编手里。。。。。。。。。。。。再也不敢乱投这个期刊了
2楼2018-09-19 18:33:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sylvia_lm

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
只要让改就有接收的希望,我也遇到过这种改后重审的情况,有被拒的,也有接收的,好好改吧
3楼2018-09-22 10:19:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

预应力猪蹄

铁虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我看到意见里有的是关于创新性的,所以不好说,是你的创新性没有写出来还是真没什么创新,前者就还好。后者就挺麻烦了,涉及改方法,补工况等。
4楼2018-09-26 18:27:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaoluobos

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
一定要好好修改,态度谦卑一些

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2018-11-28 10:33:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 沧浪之水_ 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见