Corrosion science 投稿后编辑意见，如何回复的问题
Corrosion science投稿时编辑给的状态 revision requested 但是意见信里面这样写的：
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Corrosion Science. In particular, due to the large influx of papers that we experience and increasingly high standards of incoming submissions and the resulting increased pressure on reviewers, we need to conduct a critical preliminary screening of the papers that we receive for publication prior to their submission for peer review.
Unfortunately, after reviewing your paper and in view of the increasingly stiff competition for space and impact in Corrosion Science, I feel that it is not suitable for publication in the journal in its present form and is unlikely to be favourably reviewed by the referees. I would like to emphasize that by taking such a decision, I want to save time on your side since the reviewing process is very strict and extremely tough, and only extremely original and exciting papers are accepted with minor revisions.
这个还有修改的必要吗？倒是没有说reject，但是，是不是修改返回还是要被据的？
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这个没有回复的必要了吧，就是拒了，不再送审，但修改后或许可以重投，至于哪里值得修改就不知道了啊
要是拒稿的话为什么编辑不直接拒呢？给了我一个修改的状态，应该是可以修改后重投的，感觉自己做的也不好，但是还是想同意修改，然后投完再看看会不会送审。编辑的意思也许同行审完也是被拒。很尴尬啊。
WeChat Image_20180824153508.png
修改重投应该是没问题的 但编辑有说你哪里需要改进吗？我好像在你的意见中没看到这些信息呢 反正就说现在的版本肯定不行
编辑给的意见倒是没有版本上的意见，给了些文章中图片和内容上的修改。
The Z' and Z" axes of the Nyquist plot should have the same scales (as in Figure 9a) but it is also necessary to add some characteristics frequencies on the diagrams.
In order to evaluate the value of the double layer capacitance I suggest to use the Brug’s formula (G.J. Brug, A.L.G. van den Eeden, M. Sluyters-Rehbach, and J. H. Sluyters, J. Electroanal. Chem. 176(1984) 275).
The data given in Table 2 corresponds to a model with a Tafel kinetics. But the equivalent circuit given in Figure 10 corresponds to a faradaic current which does not follow a Tafel kinetic, then the theory is not valid and it is not possible to extract the corrosion rate from the polarization curves.
也不太好改啊。想着是不是要再补点数据增加点创新性
，
楼主最后这篇文章怎么样了呢？重投后什么结果呢，感觉腐蚀的编辑都不按套路出牌。。
老哥，你的这个文章修改后怎么样了？送审了吗？
我去年投腐蚀科学，两个审稿人都说我的文章不在那个level上，然后编辑就拒了。你这个比我的好些。