| ²é¿´: 1965 | »Ø¸´: 7 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õß11Ö¾´æ¸ßÔ¶11½«ÔùËÍÄú 20 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
11Ö¾´æ¸ßÔ¶11¾èÖú¹ó±ö (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Corrosion science Ͷ¸åºó±à¼Òâ¼û£¬ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´µÄÎÊÌâ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
Corrosion scienceͶ¸åʱ±à¼¸øµÄ״̬ revision requested µ«ÊÇÒâ¼ûÐÅÀïÃæÕâÑùдµÄ£º Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Corrosion Science. In particular, due to the large influx of papers that we experience and increasingly high standards of incoming submissions and the resulting increased pressure on reviewers, we need to conduct a critical preliminary screening of the papers that we receive for publication prior to their submission for peer review. Unfortunately, after reviewing your paper and in view of the increasingly stiff competition for space and impact in Corrosion Science, I feel that it is not suitable for publication in the journal in its present form and is unlikely to be favourably reviewed by the referees. I would like to emphasize that by taking such a decision, I want to save time on your side since the reviewing process is very strict and extremely tough, and only extremely original and exciting papers are accepted with minor revisions. Õâ¸ö»¹ÓÐÐ޸ĵıØÒªÂ𣿵¹ÊÇûÓÐ˵reject£¬µ«ÊÇ£¬ÊDz»ÊÇÐ޸ķµ»Ø»¹ÊÇÒª±»¾ÝµÄ£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.551.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿ÉÙ¤¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O.55.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
2026Äê8ÔÂ25ÈÕ¹ú×ÔÈ»·Å°ñǰͻȻÊÕµ½ÁÐÈëÆÀÉóר¼ÒÓʼþ£¬ÓйØÏµÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
½ñÌìÎñί»á¿ªÍêÁË£¬Ã÷Ìì³ö½á¹ûÂð
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
ÔÚ¼á±ù»¹¸Ç×ű±º£µÄʱºò£¬ÎÒ¿´µ½ÁËŷŵÄ÷»¨¡£
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ã÷ÌìÓ¦¸Ã¿É²éÁË£¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÓÐûÓдóÉñ°ïÎÒ¿´¿´»ù½ð´úÂë
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
·Å°ñǰµÄ²»µ¶¨
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´

zidane8638
Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 15 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 440.4
- É¢½ð: 1732
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 433
- ÔÚÏß: 261.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 585576
- ×¢²á: 2008-08-08
- רҵ: ¹¦ÄÜÓëÖÇÄܸ߷Ö×Ó
2Â¥2018-08-24 15:26:52
11Ö¾´æ¸ßÔ¶11
¾èÖú¹ó±ö (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 10605.3
- É¢½ð: 32
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 1346
- ÔÚÏß: 127.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3722315
- ×¢²á: 2015-03-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁϱíÃæ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì

3Â¥2018-08-24 15:42:26
zidane8638
Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 15 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 440.4
- É¢½ð: 1732
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 433
- ÔÚÏß: 261.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 585576
- ×¢²á: 2008-08-08
- רҵ: ¹¦ÄÜÓëÖÇÄܸ߷Ö×Ó
4Â¥2018-08-24 16:02:36
11Ö¾´æ¸ßÔ¶11
¾èÖú¹ó±ö (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 10605.3
- É¢½ð: 32
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 1346
- ÔÚÏß: 127.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3722315
- ×¢²á: 2015-03-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁϱíÃæ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì
|
±à¼¸øµÄÒâ¼ûµ¹ÊÇûÓа汾ÉϵÄÒâ¼û£¬¸øÁËЩÎÄÕÂÖÐͼƬºÍÄÚÈÝÉϵÄÐ޸ġ£ The Z' and Z" axes of the Nyquist plot should have the same scales (as in Figure 9a) but it is also necessary to add some characteristics frequencies on the diagrams. In order to evaluate the value of the double layer capacitance I suggest to use the Brug¡¯s formula (G.J. Brug, A.L.G. van den Eeden, M. Sluyters-Rehbach, and J. H. Sluyters, J. Electroanal. Chem. 176(1984) 275). The data given in Table 2 corresponds to a model with a Tafel kinetics. But the equivalent circuit given in Figure 10 corresponds to a faradaic current which does not follow a Tafel kinetic, then the theory is not valid and it is not possible to extract the corrosion rate from the polarization curves. Ò²²»Ì«ºÃ¸Ä°¡¡£Ïë×ÅÊDz»ÊÇÒªÔÙ²¹µãÊý¾ÝÔö¼Óµã´´ÐÂÐÔ¡£ |

5Â¥2018-08-24 16:15:15
ÁîµÂ¹ÃÄï
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 249.4
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 91
- ÔÚÏß: 23.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1431038
- ×¢²á: 2011-10-08
- רҵ: ½á¹¹ÌÕ´É
6Â¥2019-05-10 18:22:45
º£ºÓÀïµÄÓã
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 50 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2872.1
- É¢½ð: 875
- ºì»¨: 52
- Ìû×Ó: 1581
- ÔÚÏß: 415.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3580029
- ×¢²á: 2014-12-06
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå΢ÄÉ»úµçÆ÷¼þÓëϵͳ
7Â¥2019-05-31 00:18:45
»ØÍ·ÒÑת½Ç7
гæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3564.6
- É¢½ð: 1392
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1241
- ÔÚÏß: 116.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 4747638
- ×¢²á: 2016-06-03
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁϵÄÄ¥ËðÓëĥʴ
|
ÎÒÈ¥ÄêͶ¸¯Ê´¿ÆÑ§£¬Á½¸öÉó¸åÈ˶¼ËµÎÒµÄÎÄÕ²»ÔÚÄǸölevelÉÏ£¬È»ºó±à¼¾Í¾ÜÁË¡£ÄãÕâ¸ö±ÈÎҵĺÃЩ¡£ ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |
8Â¥2019-05-31 09:22:51









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
28