| 查看: 1391 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者11志存高远11将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
11志存高远11捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
Corrosion science 投稿后编辑意见，如何回复的问题已有1人参与
|
|
|
Corrosion science投稿时编辑给的状态 revision requested 但是意见信里面这样写的： Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Corrosion Science. In particular, due to the large influx of papers that we experience and increasingly high standards of incoming submissions and the resulting increased pressure on reviewers, we need to conduct a critical preliminary screening of the papers that we receive for publication prior to their submission for peer review. Unfortunately, after reviewing your paper and in view of the increasingly stiff competition for space and impact in Corrosion Science, I feel that it is not suitable for publication in the journal in its present form and is unlikely to be favourably reviewed by the referees. I would like to emphasize that by taking such a decision, I want to save time on your side since the reviewing process is very strict and extremely tough, and only extremely original and exciting papers are accepted with minor revisions. 这个还有修改的必要吗？倒是没有说reject，但是，是不是修改返回还是要被据的？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博三一直没文章怎么办
已经有26人回复
-
信息三处送审了吗？
已经有3人回复
-
大佬们，哪位大神知道E09有没有送啊？
已经有7人回复
-
有知道工材e01情况的吗？
已经有13人回复
-
优秀毕业论文 指导教师，普通老师有希望吗？
已经有5人回复
-
求考研导师(24年底我才考，材料类，提前联系)
已经有7人回复
-
又忍不住想吐槽文科的学术圈
已经有4人回复
-
考博跨专业可以跨多远
已经有5人回复
-
绍兴文理学院怎么样？有没有坑啊
已经有11人回复
-
谁要做个人网站，可以交流啊！
已经有32人回复
11志存高远11
捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6031.8
- 散金: 32
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 627
- 在线: 124.8小时
- 虫号: 3722315
- 注册: 2015-03-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料表面科学与工程
3楼2018-08-24 15:42:26
11志存高远11
捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6031.8
- 散金: 32
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 627
- 在线: 124.8小时
- 虫号: 3722315
- 注册: 2015-03-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料表面科学与工程
|
编辑给的意见倒是没有版本上的意见，给了些文章中图片和内容上的修改。 The Z' and Z" axes of the Nyquist plot should have the same scales (as in Figure 9a) but it is also necessary to add some characteristics frequencies on the diagrams. In order to evaluate the value of the double layer capacitance I suggest to use the Brug’s formula (G.J. Brug, A.L.G. van den Eeden, M. Sluyters-Rehbach, and J. H. Sluyters, J. Electroanal. Chem. 176(1984) 275). The data given in Table 2 corresponds to a model with a Tafel kinetics. But the equivalent circuit given in Figure 10 corresponds to a faradaic current which does not follow a Tafel kinetic, then the theory is not valid and it is not possible to extract the corrosion rate from the polarization curves. 也不太好改啊。想着是不是要再补点数据增加点创新性。 |
5楼2018-08-24 16:15:15
50