专业顶级期刊，收到接收信2周后收到拒稿信，WTF？
给专业内一高分期刊投稿，一个月给修回，一个审稿人意见很积极，另一个提了一些在讨论中要增加的内容，用了一个月很认真地修改，补充数据，修回的response就写了20多页，最后修回去。再次review一个半月后邮箱收到邮件说接收了，又过了2周收到邮件说拒稿？WTF...作为将近10分的期刊这么不严谨？我第一次听说接收了还会拒稿，而且理由十分简单，就是第三个审稿人觉的文章有很多problem.
有大神见过这种情况吗？一般什么情况会接收后拒稿而且不给具体理由？我应不应该写argue？
两次邮件如下：
第一次，接收：
An editorial decision has been made on your manuscript xxxx-D-18-01156R1, and we are pleased to inform you that it has been accepted for publication.
We will send a formal decision letter as soon as possible, but please be aware that we are handling a large number of manuscripts and we ask for your patience.
两周后邮件过来居然又拒了：
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to xxx. It has been reviewed by members of the Editorial Board, and I am sorry to inform you that it was not accepted for publication. Reviewer comments are attached for your information.
Reviewers' comments:
Editor in Chief Comment : A third independent new reviewer felt there were too many problems with this paper to accept.
如此简单的comment
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
期刊这么傲娇吗，投个文章真难
接收了还能拒，这么恐怖的嘛
我觉得写吧，编辑有点不负责任了我觉得，起码让他说说到底是哪些?too many problems，只说有很多问题，具体啥问题却不说，坑人嘛这不是！
，
肯定是因為第三位�?查者提出很嚴重的問題，例如無創新點，稿件內容的重複率太高，中文稿已發過�?似的文章等等。
祝福
EIC可以在任何阶段拒稿，不需要理由！
要求对方提供详细的意见吧
去打他