当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >编辑回信reject但是信里说resubmit,文章状态是reject

编辑回信reject但是信里说resubmit,文章状态是reject

作者 布鲁斯小南
来源: 小木虫 2350 47 举报帖子
+关注

有没有大神帮我看一下这个编辑回信到底是什么意思
Dear Miss. Xu,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. I regret to inform you that it is unacceptable for publication.
Please refer to the comments listed at the end of this letter for details of why I reached this decision.
We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal and for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Kind regards,
John F Kennedy
Editor
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Comments from the editors and reviewers:
-Reviewer 1

  -
The gelatinization of starch granules in water has been extensively studied since at least 50-60 years. However, the gelatinization in non-aqueous medium has been rarely considered. As mentioned by authors, the issue takes importance from the extended used of plasticers for, e.g., obtaining edible films. In this regard, the results reported in the manuscript deserve consideration for publication. However, as it is, the manuscript is incomplete for recommending publication. The following points are oriented to improving the quality of the manuscript:

1. Conduct FTIR analysis to gain insights in the molecular changes of gelatinized starch chains in glycerol. For instance, the issue of retrogradation is well-known for aqueous medium, but not for glycerol.

2. From FTIR, estimate via deconvolution the ratios 1022/147 and 995/1022 and provide an interpretation according with literature.

3. Estimate the relative crystallinity content from XRD.

4. Flow curves and oscillatory tests could be useful for understanding the gelatinization mechanisms under glycerol conditions. For instance, provide rheological oscillatory tests for the residual starch fraction for the different temperatures.

EIC
Thsi work is incomplete andneeds more done to make a good paper = when complete please re-submit the paper to this journal - thanks.

 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • l_ning_pc

    希望很大,当作大修一下好好修改问题不大

  • lily686

    我有两篇文章都是拒稿重投,然后大修小修接收,流程反而比一审给大修的快些,一定要按照审稿人意见认真修改

  • 专送一血

    认真修改,逐条回复,重新投希望很大。都是这么过来的。

  • danghaha

    和大修一样,好好修改就行了,可能等的时间长一点

  • zhaokanbing

    两个都是大修
    所以编辑给你拒稿了
    让你重投
    可以按照大修的格式重新投
    不过要按照reviewer的要求修改好,

  • 若水863

    问题比大修还严重吧,需要重新做实验重写

猜你喜欢