MDPI旗下的《sustainability》大修,录用可能性大吗?
投稿半个月不到,两个审稿专家,专家1的意见是:
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
专家2的意见是:
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
不知道录用的可能大不大,有经验的虫友指导下,谢谢
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
想问一下,除了下面的comments需要一一回应之外,上面的can be improved 和 must be improved需要回应么?如果需要回应的话,怎么回应呢??
请问同学刚投完这个杂志过了多久编辑接收的?我投完除了一个自动的邮件发来,现在一直是pending review,一天了没消息。焦虑中。。。
,
很大。
我的大修回去,两天返回小修,小修返回第二天接收!
是投的materials