MDPI旗下的《sustainability》大修,录用可能性大吗?
投稿半个月不到,两个审稿专家,专家1的意见是:
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
专家2的意见是:
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
不知道录用的可能大不大,有经验的虫友指导下,谢谢
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
。。。。你审稿意见都不说,别人怎么帮你
什么领域啊。楼主是直接英文写作的么
这个录用机会很大!加油好好回答审稿人问题!
,
录用机会挺大,逐条认真修改
mdpi的杂志只要给修,录用的概率就非常的大
祝福