长达80天的投稿，今天收到了拒稿回复。
我是做锂电负极材料的，此次审稿意见中，有两个评价很积极，第一个只涉及手稿文字中的小错误，第二个有10条意见，但接受愿望很大。第三个意见全盘否定MnO负极材料、介孔材料不适合做锂电负极。原文如下:

Reviewer #3: This paper does not appear enough scientific material to be published in Carbon journal. The authors should know that anode material in Li-ion cells operates only in the narrow range of potential from 0.005V vs Li to ca. 1V vs Li (in the case of graphite even lower to 0.5Vvs Li), hence, presenting the capacity values until 3V vs Li is without any sense. The real capacity of this material is below 600 mAh/g. Additionally, enormous irreversible capacity during the first cycle completely eliminates this material from any possible application. The authors are too much enthusiastic about this material. Generally mesoporous materials are not adapted for anode. I suggest rejection of this paper.
在此，想求助各位，请不吝给我一些申诉经验。我希望能有机会重新送审。

 返回小木虫查看更多