投稿Applied Intelligence返回major revisions,但只有一条意见,求助各位!
如题,下面是邮件内容,我感觉是没有送专家审稿,编辑直接给的意见,让和recent的方法对比,不知道我理解的对不对,另外我不确定recent按什么个时间节点算,感觉工作量有点大,得完全重现别人的方法。小弟第一次投SCI没有经验,望各位大佬指点一下!
Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments. Your list of responses should be uploaded as a file in addition to your revised manuscript.
COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:
Editorial Pre-Screening: Results are compared with several years old methodologies. Authors need to establish clear superiority of their methodology through comprehensive comparison results with recent algorithms to publish in Applied Intelligence.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
hi,zhaopch_2015
我的方法是卷积神经网络应用到中医图像进行分类。
同样的受到编辑的提示。
我真的需要这个杂志近几年类似的文章么?
需要从那方面入手呀。
谢谢
,
先按照要求回答一下吧
Hi, daniel_gy,
我也收到同样的审稿意见。请问您后来是怎么处理的?找到这个期刊的文章,加入到算法对比里了吗?
期待您的回复。
师兄说这属于软拒,撤稿了,因为着急毕业,重新投了一个四区的。
师兄说这属于软拒,撤稿了,因为着急毕业,重新投了一个四区的。
这个是正常的,这个期刊一审的时候都是这样,主编会先提意见,修改后会再送审
多引用该期刊上发表的文献就行,放到前言中。