当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >投稿Applied Intelligence返回major revisions,但只有一条意见,求助各位!

投稿Applied Intelligence返回major revisions,但只有一条意见,求助各位!

作者 daniel_gy
来源: 小木虫 950 19 举报帖子
+关注

如题,下面是邮件内容,我感觉是没有送专家审稿,编辑直接给的意见,让和recent的方法对比,不知道我理解的对不对,另外我不确定recent按什么个时间节点算,感觉工作量有点大,得完全重现别人的方法。小弟第一次投SCI没有经验,望各位大佬指点一下!
Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions.  When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments.  Your list of responses should be uploaded as a file in addition to your revised manuscript.

COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

Editorial Pre-Screening: Results are compared with several years old methodologies. Authors need to establish clear superiority of their methodology through comprehensive comparison results with recent algorithms to publish in Applied Intelligence. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • nono2009

    找近1-2年,特别是发表在该期刊上的1~2种方法对比一下

  • zhaopch_2015

    就是你引用文献的问题,杂志一般对近三年文献有比例要求的,建议楼主首先搜这杂志近几年类似的文章,做个对比就好了

  • daniel_gy

    引用回帖:
    4楼: Originally posted by zhaopch_2015 at 2018-01-03 09:36:58
    就是你引用文献的问题,杂志一般对近三年文献有比例要求的,建议楼主首先搜这杂志近几年类似的文章,做个对比就好了

    一般近三年多少比例,我参考文献总共43篇,2015~2017年的有28篇

  • daniel_gy

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2018-01-02 22:45:39
    找近1-2年,特别是发表在该期刊上的1~2种方法对比一下

    感谢您的建议

  • alyato

    hi,daniel_gy.
    我1月5号投了这个期刊,1月13号收到类是的结果。
    COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

    Editorial Pre-Screening: This paper has not reached to the acceptable level for publication in Applied Intelligence and lacks originality and novelty from applied intelligence perspective. It is not clear what is original. Authors need to bring novelty and originality to their work and need to establish clear superiority of their methodology through comprehensive comparison results with recent algorithms to publish in Applied Intelligence. They should provide proper references.

    请问你的是怎么处理的?
    请问你做了对比实验了么?与该期刊的近几年的发表论文?
    还是只是引用了该期刊的发表文章?
    谢谢,

猜你喜欢