投稿到Applied Surface Science被拒,有必要申诉吗?
大概20天前投稿到Applied Surface Science,论文内容是关于光催化的,本来觉得应该没什么问题,不想结果很惨,编辑给我的回信内容如下:
Dear Dr. xxx,
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it.
Reviewer #1:
In this study, xxx are synthesized by xxxx.
xxxxxxxxx.
I feel that this paper is not suitable for publication in Applied Surface Science because the content reported in this manuscript lacks enough novelty and depth, and is not important.
Also, the photocatalytic mechanism is not well investigated.
Finally, some important references from Applied Surface Science were overlooked.
只有一个审稿人,而且没有具体的问题,编辑就根据这个审稿人的意见把我给拒了,这种情况下申诉有用吗?一般的申诉信应该怎么写啊?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
要不要申诉看老板态度,我上次被拒,怒发冲冠,已经写好了上(喷)诉(人)的邮件了!老板苦口婆心的劝了20分钟,没让我去投诉,最后换了期刊录用了。
没用
这个评价还申述?
你自己觉得你的文章新意在何处?想明了再想申诉的事
嗯嗯,那还是算了
审稿人就是断章取义,催化机理部分有不少内容与数据,居然说我没对机理没有阐述,是他本人没看到,不过看上面几位的回复,还是算了,该投他刊吧
,
如果那他们说的不对可以,如果还有点道理,意义不大