APL找不到审稿人,被拒稿,能不能申诉?
编辑找了五个审稿人,都拒绝审稿,最后编辑将文章拒了,还能不能申诉?
投稿状态如下:
Stage Start Date
Decision Sent to Author 02-Nov-2017 10:59:46
Decision Letter Being Prepared 02-Nov-2017 08:36:00
Associate Editor Decision Completed 02-Nov-2017 08:36:00
Reviewer Assignment Started 01-Nov-2017 18:37:22
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review 01-Nov-2017 18:37:22
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent 01-Nov-2017 15:27:41
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review 31-Oct-2017 18:00:32
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent 31-Oct-2017 14:18:35
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review 30-Oct-2017 20:32:57
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent 30-Oct-2017 16:17:52
Potential Reviewer No Response to Invitation 30-Oct-2017 16:17:41
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent 23-Oct-2017 12:21:39
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review 23-Oct-2017 12:15:09
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent 23-Oct-2017 11:59:34
Potential Reviewers Selected 23-Oct-2017 11:59:28
Reviewer Assignment Started 21-Oct-2017 19:53:19
Securing Associate Editor 20-Oct-2017 13:46:03
Securing Editor 20-Oct-2017 13:46:02
Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed 20-Oct-2017 13:46:02
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started 20-Oct-2017 04:19:04
Securing Editor 20-Oct-2017 04:19:04
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 20-Oct-2017 04:19:03
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 19-Oct-2017 22:29:42
副主编的拒稿信:
Despite this number of reviewers, we have been unable to secure sufficient, substantive reviews to make an informed editorial decision. We typically require two reviews to make a decision but can make a decision with a single, comprehensive review. Neither of these requirements was met in this case.
When an exceptionally large number of qualified reviewers within the field of a paper decline the review assignment, this is generally seen as an indication of a lack of interest in the topic of the paper for the readers of our Journal. In such cases, we find that continuing to look for qualified reviewers who will accept the assignment leads to further delay. I am, therefore, returning the paper to you, so you can seek publication elsewhere where other qualified reviewers may be found. If one review was obtained, the reviewer's comments are given below for reference.
Please accept my apologies for the delay this has caused in the publication of your manuscript.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
祝福
第一次见到这种情况,文章被 AE 送审后因为找不到合适的审稿人而拒。ANYWAY, 赶紧找下家
顶
投稿的时候,可以推荐审稿人的。不管是申诉还是重投,自己先把审稿人找好。
说明一下:首先投稿的时候已经推荐审稿人,可能是编辑没有采纳,也可能是其他原因。
我也是第一次碰见这种期刊,编辑已经送审,只是没有审稿人愿意审稿。这种拒稿理由太牵强了。
已经发邮件申诉了,同时又提供了几个审稿人。编辑也认为很合理,同意了我的申诉。
总的来说,APL的编辑还是比较负责任的,效率也比较高。
666
脗楼脰梅脛茫潞脙拢卢脦脪脳卯陆眉脥露碌脛脪禄脝陋APL脪虏脢脟5赂枚脡贸赂氓脠脣露录戮脺戮酶脡贸赂氓拢卢脧脰脭脷碌脛脳麓脤卢脢脟赂卤卤脿录颅review拢卢虏禄脰陋碌脌禄谩虏禄禄谩脕鹿脕鹿拢卢脦脪脥露脦脛脮脗碌脛脢卤潞貌脙禄脫脨脥脝录枚脡贸赂氓脠脣拢卢脟毛脦脢脪陋脢脟卤禄戮脺潞贸赂脙脭玫脙麓脡锚脣脽脛脴拢
,