当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >APL找不到审稿人,被拒稿,能不能申诉?

APL找不到审稿人,被拒稿,能不能申诉?

作者 wangbing108222
来源: 小木虫 700 14 举报帖子
+关注

编辑找了五个审稿人,都拒绝审稿,最后编辑将文章拒了,还能不能申诉?
投稿状态如下:
Stage        Start Date
Decision Sent to Author        02-Nov-2017 10:59:46
Decision Letter Being Prepared        02-Nov-2017 08:36:00
Associate Editor Decision Completed        02-Nov-2017 08:36:00
Reviewer Assignment Started        01-Nov-2017 18:37:22
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review        01-Nov-2017 18:37:22
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        01-Nov-2017 15:27:41
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review        31-Oct-2017 18:00:32
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        31-Oct-2017 14:18:35
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review        30-Oct-2017 20:32:57
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        30-Oct-2017 16:17:52
Potential Reviewer No Response to Invitation        30-Oct-2017 16:17:41
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        23-Oct-2017 12:21:39
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review        23-Oct-2017 12:15:09
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        23-Oct-2017 11:59:34
Potential Reviewers Selected        23-Oct-2017 11:59:28
Reviewer Assignment Started        21-Oct-2017 19:53:19
Securing Associate Editor        20-Oct-2017 13:46:03
Securing Editor        20-Oct-2017 13:46:02
Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed        20-Oct-2017 13:46:02
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started        20-Oct-2017 04:19:04
Securing Editor        20-Oct-2017 04:19:04
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office        20-Oct-2017 04:19:03
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted        19-Oct-2017 22:29:42

副主编的拒稿信:
Despite this number of reviewers, we have been unable to secure sufficient, substantive reviews to make an informed editorial decision. We typically require two reviews to make a decision but can make a decision with a single, comprehensive review. Neither of these requirements was met in this case.

When an exceptionally large number of qualified reviewers within the field of a paper decline the review assignment, this is generally seen as an indication of a lack of interest in the topic of the paper for the readers of our Journal. In such cases, we find that continuing to look for qualified reviewers who will accept the assignment leads to further delay. I am, therefore, returning the paper to you, so you can seek publication elsewhere where other qualified reviewers may be found. If one review was obtained, the reviewer's comments are given below for reference.

Please accept my apologies for the delay this has caused in the publication of your manuscript. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • xiaogao0859

    五个都拒,基本没戏,改投别刊省时省事

  • peterflyer

    感觉申诉的意义不大,还是赶快找其他合适的期刊改投吧,时间不等人。

  • wangbing108222

    引用回帖:
    3脗楼: Originally posted by xiaogao0859 at 2017-11-03 09:13:53
    脦氓赂枚露录戮脺拢卢禄霉卤戮脙禄脧路拢卢赂脛脥露卤冒驴炉脢隆脢卤脢隆脢脗

    露脿脨禄

  • nono2009

    找不到审稿人说明你的研究比较冷门,还是投到比较对口的期刊为好。

  • mariayeyan

    再投这个刊物就是浪费时间了,转投他刊为妙

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓