回复意见中,有一条我不想添加他的建议,我想委婉回答,我的回答委婉吗?如何改进?
The study try to explain the flexural behavior using stiffness term, the way the author point out the beam stiffness to check carefully. First of all the, author does not show how calculate the stiffness, secondly, the stiffness of composite section depend on effective moment of inertia Ie and E modulus of elasticity of materials, did author considered these two parameters in stiffness calculation?
[Response]
Thank you for pointing this. The focus of using stiffness is to illustrate the effectiveness of the new method in this paper. It doesn't focus on the stiffness calculation method. Thus, the two parameters in stiffness have not been considered.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
我们中文期刊包括很多很高级别的期刊的论文,很多重要参数的来由喜欢直接绕过去,让读者去猜。但是,当我们读SCI文章时会发现即使很小问题都描述得有理有据,整片文章就是到证明题,
只要审稿人的意见在理,楼主尽量按照要求来修改,如果不能修改需要说明原因,要做到言之有据,不能给人留下怕麻烦的印象。
祝福
反驳审稿意见可以,但一定得有理有据,这样简单回复就是不想做的意思,就是自找被拒
英语都不咋的、、、