当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >这种情况是否要申诉一下

这种情况是否要申诉一下

作者 msh1216
来源: 小木虫 700 14 举报帖子
+关注

请教各位虫友,这种情况是否要申诉一下。
二审回来的意见都不错,但是编辑说意见不好给拒了,还是我理解错了。望大家不吝赐教!
谢谢!
Dear Mrs. X,

Thank you for considering Journal of Cleaner Production.  
After careful review, I regret to inform you that reviewers don't support to publish your above noted manuscript for publication in "Journal of Cleaner Production". I have appended the comments of the reviewers in order for you to understand the basis for the final decision.

However, I do think it could be considered by another journal, and I would like to suggest that you take advantage of the article transfer service that "Journal of Cleaner Production" is part of. This gives you the option to have your manuscript files and details transferred to another journal. This removes the need for you to resubmit and reformat your manuscript, saving you valuable time and effort during the submission process.

If you click the link below you will find a list of journal that may relevant to your research.  You have the option to accept or decline the transfer offer from the same web page:
https://ees.elsevier.com/jclepro ... &l=D9QLMOHJ

Should you accept this transfer, you will have the opportunity to revise your paper, taking into account the reviews received from "Journal of Cleaner Production".

This option does not constitute a guarantee that your paper will be published in the suggested Journal, but it is our hope that this arrangement will help expedite the process for promising papers.

To learn more about the new article transfer service, please visit
www.elsevier.com/authors/article-transfer-service

Yours sincerely,
Bin Chen, Ph.D.
Associate Editor
Journal of Cleaner Production

Follow us on Mendeley group "Journal of Cleaner Production".

https://www.mendeley.com/communi ... es_email_jclp-group

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: After a second reading of the revised paper, and the answers for the comments provided by the reviewers, I agree with the final publication. This is due the fact that the authors have provided all necessary clarification to the questions and comments.





Reviewer #2: According to revisions provided by authors, the Manuscript is now acceptable to be published by Journal. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • xiaogao0859

    很让人不理解这结果

  • jiamaolee

    还是问下比较好,审稿人都同意接受了啊!有没有可能编辑搞错了

  • 523156717

    我觉得编辑可能弄错了

  • msh1216

    引用回帖:
    10楼: Originally posted by jiamaolee at 2017-10-25 12:43:06
    还是问下比较好,审稿人都同意接受了啊!有没有可能编辑搞错了

    编辑回复了,的确格式语法不适合发表。没有办法继续奋斗吧。感谢回复

  • msh1216

    引用回帖:
    11楼: Originally posted by 523156717 at 2017-10-25 12:48:17
    我觉得编辑可能弄错了

    编辑回复了,的确格式语法不适合发表。没有办法继续奋斗吧

  • 张健0513

    给主编发邮件,这编辑过分了

猜你喜欢