当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >这种情况是否要申诉一下

这种情况是否要申诉一下

作者 msh1216
来源: 小木虫 700 14 举报帖子
+关注

请教各位虫友,这种情况是否要申诉一下。
二审回来的意见都不错,但是编辑说意见不好给拒了,还是我理解错了。望大家不吝赐教!
谢谢!
Dear Mrs. X,

Thank you for considering Journal of Cleaner Production.  
After careful review, I regret to inform you that reviewers don't support to publish your above noted manuscript for publication in "Journal of Cleaner Production". I have appended the comments of the reviewers in order for you to understand the basis for the final decision.

However, I do think it could be considered by another journal, and I would like to suggest that you take advantage of the article transfer service that "Journal of Cleaner Production" is part of. This gives you the option to have your manuscript files and details transferred to another journal. This removes the need for you to resubmit and reformat your manuscript, saving you valuable time and effort during the submission process.

If you click the link below you will find a list of journal that may relevant to your research.  You have the option to accept or decline the transfer offer from the same web page:
https://ees.elsevier.com/jclepro ... &l=D9QLMOHJ

Should you accept this transfer, you will have the opportunity to revise your paper, taking into account the reviews received from "Journal of Cleaner Production".

This option does not constitute a guarantee that your paper will be published in the suggested Journal, but it is our hope that this arrangement will help expedite the process for promising papers.

To learn more about the new article transfer service, please visit
www.elsevier.com/authors/article-transfer-service

Yours sincerely,
Bin Chen, Ph.D.
Associate Editor
Journal of Cleaner Production

Follow us on Mendeley group "Journal of Cleaner Production".

https://www.mendeley.com/communi ... es_email_jclp-group

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: After a second reading of the revised paper, and the answers for the comments provided by the reviewers, I agree with the final publication. This is due the fact that the authors have provided all necessary clarification to the questions and comments.





Reviewer #2: According to revisions provided by authors, the Manuscript is now acceptable to be published by Journal. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • hfwen

    编辑是中国的?

  • msh1216

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by hfwen at 2017-10-25 10:30:15
    编辑是中国的?

    是的

  • tibetnamco

    Bin Chen这么处理是有些令人费解,下次当面问问他,呵呵。没有给出(足够)有说服力的退稿理由,就是让改投另外一个刊,真是醉了。如果审稿意见就是你帖出来的这么positive 的话。但是换句话来说,他既然这么说了,你申诉也没有多少用,这就是江湖,编辑说了算。估计这刊比较牛,不差稿吧

  • hmhminy

    都同意录用

  • msh1216

    引用回帖:
    4楼: Originally posted by tibetnamco at 2017-10-25 10:47:08
    Bin Chen这么处理是有些令人费解,下次当面问问他,呵呵。没有给出(足够)有说服力的退稿理由,就是让改投另外一个刊,真是醉了。如果审稿意见就是你帖出来的这么positive 的话。但是换句话来说,他既然这么说了, ...

    明白了,那我转投吧。不麻烦您当面问了

  • daixiujuan52

    这编辑我也是醉了,你可以发邮件问问吧

  • caieralice

    楼主好惨啊,有没有可能编辑弄错了发错邮件了,本来想接收的,给你发了拒稿

猜你喜欢