我的sci期刊，二审意见出来了，意见如下
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Associate Editor
Comments to the Author :
Please provide clear explanation on what is the difference between your proposed approach and other methods? Please clearly demonstrate the benefits of your approach compared to other existing methods

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
The authors allocated substantial effort to improving the quality of the manuscript.

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
What is the difference between authors' proposed modification and presented methods?
It should be given together with the benefits of this approach.

一审的时候，reviewer2的意见很长，现在没问题了。reviewer1意见少，现在反而多出了问题。
editor的意思应该叫我详细证明本方法和其他方法的不同和优势，可是我在修改稿中已经论证了啊，难道还要继续增加啊？
reviewer2的意思应该是叫我比较修改稿和原稿件的区别。
各位大神们，您们有什么好的建议？ 返回小木虫查看更多