又出新期刊了？

楼主能不能发链接发一下？

我好像没查到。

https://www.nature.com/commsphys/

引用回帖:

3楼: Originally posted by issp_summer at 2017-09-20 13:39:26
https://www.nature.com/commsphys/

Criteria for publication

To be published in Communications Physics a paper should meet several general criteria:
The results are novel (we do not consider abstracts and internet preprints to compromise novelty)
The paper provides strong evidence for its conclusions
The data are technically sound
The manuscript is important to scientists in the specific sub-field of physics.

In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding which may influence thinking in the field.

好像没用 significant XXX 这样的词，难道定位也不高？

应该是在NC和SR之间，截留NC掉下来的部分文章

跟Nature子刊的要求相比要容易是肯定的（https://www.nature.com/commsphys/about）
Communications Biology complements the other Nature Research journals by providing a new open access option for biologists while applying less stringent criteria for impact and significance than the Nature-branded journals, including Nature Communications.

但质量一定也不低：
Communications Biology, Communications Chemistry and Communications Physics are a family of broad scope open access journals. To be considered for publication papers should show a significant advance that brings new insight to a specialised field of research. Submit to Communications Biology, Communications Chemistry or Communications Physics.

举一个例子，NC的要求是：
The data is technically sound
The paper provides strong evidence for its conclusions
The results are novel (we do not consider abstracts and internet preprints to compromise novelty)
The manuscript is important to scientists in the specific field
In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field.

再举一个例子，前年新出的Nature Plants（IF=10.3）：
The data are technically sound
The paper provides strong evidence for its conclusions
The results are novel (we do not consider abstracts and internet preprints to compromise novelty)
The manuscript is important to researchers in its specific field
The paper will be interesting to a general audience of those working in plants research.
In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field. There should be some reason why the work deserves the visibility of publication in Nature Plants rather than a more specialist journal.

其实跟CP相比差不多：
The results are novel (we do not consider abstracts and internet preprints to compromise novelty)
The paper provides strong evidence for its conclusions
The data are technically sound
The manuscript is important to scientists in the specific sub-field of physics.
In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding which may influence thinking in the field，

Commun. Phys.已经正式创刊，首批文章在线刊登了

https://www.nature.com/commsphys/articles

重要的是Communications physics和Physical Review A-E/Applied/Materials相比如何？能否达到PR的Rapid communications的水平？PRA-E/Applied/Materials的优势在不收费，可能影响因子不如Communications physics的高