24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 16804  |  回复: 6

issp_summer

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Nature 旗下的Communications Physics 怎么样? 已有4人参与

如题,nature旗下新出了个期刊Communications Physics,不知道怎么样?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

小书园

至尊木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
又出新期刊了?

楼主能不能发链接发一下?

我好像没查到。
星星之火,可以燎原。
2楼2017-09-20 01:28:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

issp_summer

金虫 (小有名气)

3楼2017-09-20 13:39:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

小书园

至尊木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by issp_summer at 2017-09-20 13:39:26
https://www.nature.com/commsphys/

Criteria for publication

To be published in Communications Physics a paper should meet several general criteria:
The results are novel (we do not consider abstracts and internet preprints to compromise novelty)
The paper provides strong evidence for its conclusions
The data are technically sound
The manuscript is important to scientists in the specific sub-field of physics.

In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding which may influence thinking in the field.

好像没用 significant XXX 这样的词,难道定位也不高?
星星之火,可以燎原。
4楼2017-09-20 14:46:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

塔马什

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
应该是在NC和SR之间,截留NC掉下来的部分文章

跟Nature子刊的要求相比要容易是肯定的(https://www.nature.com/commsphys/about
Communications Biology complements the other Nature Research journals by providing a new open access option for biologists while applying less stringent criteria for impact and significance than the Nature-branded journals, including Nature Communications.

但质量一定也不低:
Communications Biology, Communications Chemistry and Communications Physics are a family of broad scope open access journals. To be considered for publication papers should show a significant advance that brings new insight to a specialised field of research. Submit to Communications Biology, Communications Chemistry or Communications Physics.

举一个例子,NC的要求是:
The data is technically sound
The paper provides strong evidence for its conclusions
The results are novel (we do not consider abstracts and internet preprints to compromise novelty)
The manuscript is important to scientists in the specific field
In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field.

再举一个例子,前年新出的Nature Plants(IF=10.3):
The data are technically sound
The paper provides strong evidence for its conclusions
The results are novel (we do not consider abstracts and internet preprints to compromise novelty)
The manuscript is important to researchers in its specific field
The paper will be interesting to a general audience of those working in plants research.
In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field. There should be some reason why the work deserves the visibility of publication in Nature Plants rather than a more specialist journal.

其实跟CP相比差不多:
The results are novel (we do not consider abstracts and internet preprints to compromise novelty)
The paper provides strong evidence for its conclusions
The data are technically sound
The manuscript is important to scientists in the specific sub-field of physics.
In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding which may influence thinking in the field.
5楼2017-11-02 05:26:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Aryan

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
Commun. Phys.已经正式创刊,首批文章在线刊登了

https://www.nature.com/commsphys/articles
6楼2018-02-23 19:15:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
本帖仅楼主可见
7楼2018-02-24 10:11:42
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 issp_summer 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见