审稿人给了非常负面，还有希望吗？编辑也让我好好回答他的问题
Reviewer #3: The objective of the study is not clear. There is no reason why the Fe-C electrolysis/UBAF are functional for CIP removal. There is no clear results to conclude the major mechanism of CIP removal in the combined system. The EPS study and microorganisms did not provide the understanding about CIP removal mechanism in the studied system.
感觉很难回答！
求指点!
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
编辑给了你回答的机会就意味着有希望，所以务必好好回答，不懂的地方多找人探讨。
顶
看起来这个审稿人应该是给拒了，另一个给小修，最后给的大修
，
有道理
尽力