corrosion science期刊论文修改意见求助
这篇文章初审意见还行,一个专家建议直接录用,另一个专家提出一些意见,让修改。改好后我提交回去,编辑一直纠结一些格式问题,来来回回三次了,这次编辑努力貌似要拒稿,请有经验的同学帮忙看看,现在是个啥情况....
I regret to inform you that this paper is STILL not up to standard, after 5 total submissions (original + 4 revisions). We must therefore take the decision to reject it.
Please refer to the editor's comments listed below. In every report, you have been asked to CHECK your paper, but there are continuing errors. In particular, I would point out comment no. 1 below, which shows a huge error in your paper. Errors like this should NOT appear after so many resubmissions.
If you wish to CHECK your entire paper, as requested so many times, and ensure that there are no errors at all, then you can resubmit it, and it will be considered again. It would now need to be as a new submission. If you do this, you will need to provide a covering letter stating what has been done in response to EACH of the comments below, as well as any other changes made.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. I am sorry we cannot continue with this in its present sate.
Yours sincerely,
G.T. Burstein
Editor-in-Chief
Corrosion Science
Comments from the editor:
revised version R4:
然后给出了六条格式意见....
请问还有希望吗?感觉很失落,眼看就要中了,哭的心都有了。
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
太不认真了,这么多次还是有格式问题,编辑忍无可忍,既浪费你的时间又浪费编辑的时间,楼主好自为之,吸取教训
一区TOP期刊,这次更多的还是吸取教训吧。格式问题是最基本的问题。其实这也是对你的一个提醒,无论以后的论文还是将来的工作,认真是最基本的。
加油楼主。
已经据稿了 不过给了点希望 你自己好好按编辑意见逐条 修改 然后重新提交 在cover letter中说明 (ps:你要是再有错误,小心编辑直接拉黑你 你看看编辑的语气 有多烦)
,