µ±Ç°Î»Ö㺠Ê×Ò³ > ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å >corrosion scienceÆÚ¿¯ÂÛÎÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûÇóÖú

corrosion scienceÆÚ¿¯ÂÛÎÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûÇóÖú

×÷Õß ¼¡Èⲩʿ¸ç¸ç
À´Ô´: Сľ³æ 1500 30 ¾Ù±¨Ìû×Ó
+¹Ø×¢

ÕâÆªÎÄÕ³õÉóÒâ¼û»¹ÐУ¬Ò»¸öר¼Ò½¨ÒéÖ±½Ó¼Óã¬ÁíÒ»¸öר¼ÒÌá³öһЩÒâ¼û£¬ÈÃÐ޸ġ£¸ÄºÃºóÎÒÌá½»»ØÈ¥£¬±à¼­Ò»Ö±¾À½áһЩ¸ñʽÎÊÌ⣬À´À´»Ø»ØÈý´ÎÁË£¬Õâ´Î±à¼­Å¬Á¦Ã²ËÆÒª¾Ü¸å£¬ÇëÓо­ÑéµÄͬѧ°ïæ¿´¿´£¬ÏÖÔÚÊǸöɶÇé¿ö....

    I regret to inform you that this paper is STILL not up to standard, after 5 total submissions (original + 4 revisions).  We must therefore take the decision to reject it.

    Please refer to the editor's comments listed below.  In every report, you have been asked to CHECK your paper, but there are continuing errors.  In particular, I would point out comment no. 1 below, which shows a huge error in your paper.  Errors like this should NOT appear after so many resubmissions.  
    If you wish to CHECK your entire paper, as requested so many times, and ensure that there are no errors at all, then you can resubmit it, and it will be considered again.  It would now need to be as a new submission.  If you do this, you will need to provide a covering letter stating what has been done in response to EACH of the comments below, as well as any other changes made.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.  I am sorry we cannot continue with this in its present sate.

Yours sincerely,

G.T. Burstein
Editor-in-Chief
Corrosion Science

Comments from the editor:
revised version R4:

È»ºó¸ø³öÁËÁùÌõ¸ñʽÒâ¼û....





ÇëÎÊ»¹ÓÐÏ£ÍûÂ𣿸оõºÜʧÂ䣬ÑÛ¿´¾ÍÒªÖÐÁË£¬¿ÞµÄÐͼÓÐÁË¡£

 ·µ»ØÐ¡Ä¾³æ²é¿´¸ü¶à

½ñÈÕÈÈÌû
  • ¾«»ªÆÀÂÛ
  • ym66777

    ¸øÄã»ú»áÄã¾ÍÐÞߣ¬°´ÕÕÒªÇ󣬲ÎÕÕ×îÐÂÂÛÎĸñʽ£¬ÈÏÕæ¸Äß¡£

  • tepa2008

    ÈÏÕæÐ޸ģ¬Ó¦¸ÃÓÐÏ£Íû

  • mpeng1122

    ´ÕâÒâ˼ÊÇÈÃÄ㰴иåÖØÍ¶ÁË£¬¿ÉÄÜ»áÔÙÖØÐÂËÍÉó°É¡£½¨ÒéºÍ±à¼­ÁªÏµÒ»Ï£¬ÔÙÉêÇëÒ»´Î»ú»á£¬ÈÏÕæÐÞ¸ÄËùÓдíÎó¡£

    £¬

²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÏÂÔØÐ¡Ä¾³æAPP
Óë700Íò¿ÆÑдïÈËËæÊ±½»Á÷
  • ¶þάÂë
  • IOS
  • °²×¿