文章大修,其中一个reviewer要求退稿,这个修改意见怎么回复呢?
文章大修,5个审稿人中4个修改,所以编辑让大修,但其中一个reviewer要求退稿,这个修改意见怎么回复呢?
This a common review paper and there are a lot of papers published in this subject. No new insight was provided in this manuscript in term of mechanism. In fact the reviewer could not find any conclusive discussion regarding to the developed process, and related characteristics. Taking into account that a large number of the articles have been published, already, on the subject of microcystin-LR. In conclusion, this paper is not recommended to publish.
各位大神,这条意见应该怎么回复呢??谢谢啦!!!!
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
祝好
祝福
说说你的文章相对于其他已有文章的优势就行
文章的生命力在于它的创新性!审稿人质疑文章的创新性,那么楼主最好的反击武器就是再次说明文章的创新性的所在,以及与已有文章相比它的优势和意义所在。
谢谢
,
你就说针对他的意见已经经过了大改,文章的创新点有哪些,等。后面那一句就无视。