当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >SCI,三天后被拒稿。工效学方向

SCI,三天后被拒稿。工效学方向

作者 18832614342
来源: 小木虫 550 11 举报帖子
+关注

第一次投SCI,三天后被拒稿。下面是编辑拒稿原因,请虫友分析原因,是否换个杂志投?还是?? requires fairly extensive technical editing是啥意思?。PS,我是工效学方面的。感谢!!
Papers submitted to Applied Ergonomics are pre-screened and assessed prior to sending them out to reviewers. We do this with a view to understanding whether there are any problems with the paper before this stage. This process also helps us to select appropriate reviewers if the paper passes the pre-screening. The issues and potential problems we assess include whether the paper is of sufficient scientific quality, has new or interesting technical content, is acceptably written in terms of the quality of language and production, and is within the scope of Applied Ergonomics.

In the case of your submission unfortunately there are some issues with the quality of the content of your paper as follows. The manuscripts requires fairly extensive technical editing. While this can be addressed, the main issue is that the manuscript is too limited in scope for the journal to consider given the small sample size and limited conditions. The study does not really generate significant new knowledge, and the most significant exposure (repetitive bending) is fairly well understood to be a risk factor for back injuries.

Therefore I am sorry to inform you that your paper has been rejected by the journal. I wish you very good luck in your research and publishing activities. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • 18832614342

    引用回帖:
    5楼: Originally posted by kmght at 2017-06-17 00:40:12
    致命伤是the manuscript is too limited in scope for the journal to consider given the small sample size and limited conditions
    这句话基本就是判死刑了,改投吧
    ...

    受教了,谢谢

  • 18832614342

    引用回帖:
    9楼: Originally posted by 逝水无痕1990 at 2017-06-18 22:49:07
    祝福

    谢谢!

  • 圣儿宝贝

    我也是收到类似的回复,请问,你最后是改投什么杂志了?

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓