SCI,三天后被拒稿。工效学方向
第一次投SCI,三天后被拒稿。下面是编辑拒稿原因,请虫友分析原因,是否换个杂志投?还是?? requires fairly extensive technical editing是啥意思?。PS,我是工效学方面的。感谢!!
Papers submitted to Applied Ergonomics are pre-screened and assessed prior to sending them out to reviewers. We do this with a view to understanding whether there are any problems with the paper before this stage. This process also helps us to select appropriate reviewers if the paper passes the pre-screening. The issues and potential problems we assess include whether the paper is of sufficient scientific quality, has new or interesting technical content, is acceptably written in terms of the quality of language and production, and is within the scope of Applied Ergonomics.
In the case of your submission unfortunately there are some issues with the quality of the content of your paper as follows. The manuscripts requires fairly extensive technical editing. While this can be addressed, the main issue is that the manuscript is too limited in scope for the journal to consider given the small sample size and limited conditions. The study does not really generate significant new knowledge, and the most significant exposure (repetitive bending) is fairly well understood to be a risk factor for back injuries.
Therefore I am sorry to inform you that your paper has been rejected by the journal. I wish you very good luck in your research and publishing activities.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
The manuscripts requires fairly extensive technical editing.
稿件没有送审,因为学术价值不够,需要较大的编辑修改才能达到杂志社的要求,建议改投。
没有创新性,受众范围小
不过这个期刊的好处是,拒绝的快。我有一篇也是,说公式太多,要偏应用的,好吧。
致命伤是the manuscript is too limited in scope for the journal to consider given the small sample size and limited conditions
这句话基本就是判死刑了,改投吧
,
创新性不足够,这是拒稿的主要原因。其次需要对稿件进行广泛的技术编辑,也就是说文章中存在很多语法、格式等问题需要润色和改正。建议在改投其他期刊前认真修改稿件。
要有创新性,这样受众范围才会变大
the manuscript is too limited in scope