这样的审稿意见,应该怎样应对(拒稿重投,有一个审稿人问的问题硬伤)
Dear Dr. xxx: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in the American Chemical Society journal Inorganic Chemistry. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. Reviewer 2 has have expressed serious reservations and made suggestions for further experiments that I don't believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Inorganic Chemistry. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that included such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision should address the reviewers' comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns. I am sorry to have to convey this negative decision to you. Nevertheless, we appreciate your choice of Inorganic Chemistry as a possible forum for the presentation of your work.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
,,
好
谢谢!
谢谢
不是大牛的,哎,已经被弄得快得抑郁症了!
已没有一点力气了,祈福这次能中,这次再被拒都不知怎么办了
,
加油!其实从总结数据开始写,到不停修改,再到最后的投稿,都是一个很波折的过程,我的还没投不过也是。只要迈出投出去的这一步,文章最后总会有着落的。保持好的心态,向前看。