这样的审稿意见,应该怎样应对(拒稿重投,有一个审稿人问的问题硬伤)
Dear Dr. xxx: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in the American Chemical Society journal Inorganic Chemistry. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. Reviewer 2 has have expressed serious reservations and made suggestions for further experiments that I don't believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Inorganic Chemistry. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that included such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision should address the reviewers' comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns. I am sorry to have to convey this negative decision to you. Nevertheless, we appreciate your choice of Inorganic Chemistry as a possible forum for the presentation of your work.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
能做实验搞到新数据你就能行
修后重投,如果是大牛的杂志,给这个已经很不容易了。
,
顶
一
祝福
赶紧补实验吧