最近投一篇Bioresource Technology给了大修，修改之后，编辑（法国编辑）没有针对我的修复稿提意见，而提出了如下问题：
Comments:
As stated very clearly in the instructions for authors, supplmentary material should not be cited directly in the text. Just a sentence placed after the acknowledgements can inform the reader that such material is available from the website of the journal.

因为我正文后面没有添加supplementary material的说明，所以我认为编辑的意思是要加如下这句话：
Appendix A. Supplementary data
  Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.XX.XXX.

所以，我把上面这句话加到正文后面。第二次回复稿过去了，过两天，编辑又针对上面的问题提出如下问题：
Comments:
Supplmentary material is still cited in the text. For example "As shown in Fig. S1, specific activity of permeabilzed" is not correct.

现在我迷糊，这是啥意思，应该怎么改？是否把正文中类似于“As shown in Fig. S1”这种表述改成（Fig. S1）就行。求助啊，别因为这个小问题被拒了，得不偿失。请各大虫友们帮忙，有没有出现类似问题的，帮忙解决一下，谢谢。 返回小木虫查看更多