当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >两个审稿意见差别大,重投后接收的希望大不?如何回复意见?谢谢

两个审稿意见差别大,重投后接收的希望大不?如何回复意见?谢谢

作者 tang410
来源: 小木虫 450 9 举报帖子
+关注

Your paper was carefully reviewed by the authorized reviewers of the IEEJ Transactions.  Result is C (Reevaluation after Referral).  Please note that you are requested to respond to all comments by the reviewers when you resubmit the paper.
The inquiries and comments are as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

[Reviewer "A"] Result = B(Conditional Acceptance)
[Reviewer "D"] Result = D(Reject)

------------------------------------------
Reviewer A

You should take a restraint characteristics of current differential protection relay into consideration to show that this paper is useful.


------------------------------------------
Reviewer D

  This paper presents the capacitive current compensation that affects the sensitivity of the current differential protection relay under the complex four transmission lines on the same tower. However, this method is only calculate the symmetrical components of capacitive currents in various cases, it is easy to derive the compensation current under the given capacitance parameters. The simulation is also only a circuit calculation under the conditions of the given capacitance values, and it does not indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Hence, this paper is in an insufficient state at the point of the originality and impact to the field. Therefore, my judgement is D.

-P.4 Line 9 and 19: The description of "equation (13)" seems to be "equation (9)".
-Chap 4 Fig.5-Fig.13, Table 1: Since the detail simulation conditions are unknown, the validity of the results are not clear. Furthermore, the legend of the graph overlaps on the lines, the results are unknown.
-P.7 Table1: It is not clear which column of "Compensated on four circuit" is on operation mode M2. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • crest_2008

    两个reviewer其实都是对你论文的创新性、有用性有问题。reviewer D的建议感觉还是比较客观的。如果你觉得是他理解错了,没有领会你文章的内容。那么就要再仔细看看自己的文章是不是有不足或者表述模糊的地方。
    再仔细改改,明确下文章的亮点,文章让别人看起来有理有据,还是有希望的。
    加油,

  • tiffany123

    仲裁

  • zyk1234

    我也遇到了这个问题,您的最后结果怎么样啊?

  • zhang2003174

    这个我也经历过,两个审稿人,一接收一拒,我们花了大量的时间针对拒稿审稿人的意见进行修改,增加内容,增加实验。二审小修录用了,还是不错的杂志,2区的。所以,楼主要有信心,只要认真修改就有机会。

  • xdxiaoxuan

    结果怎么样?我也投了这个期刊,前两天给了审稿意见,但是迟迟不给我看,不知道啥情况啊。

  • chenyixi9802

    楼主结果怎么样

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓