24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3045)
>文献求助 (190)
>虫友互识 (190)
>导师招生 (166)
>考博 (105)
>休闲灌水 (70)
>招聘信息布告栏 (52)
>硕博家园 (49)
>论文投稿 (45)
>基金申请 (43)
>博后之家 (42)
>考研 (38)
>公派出国 (35)
>找工作 (32)
>论文道贺祈福 (31)
>教师之家 (25)

返回列表

tang410

新虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 5280.8
散金: 2531
红花: 7
帖子: 785
在线: 122.4小时
虫号: 1891827
注册: 2012-07-13
专业: 电力系统

[求助] 两个审稿意见差别大，重投后接收的希望大不？如何回复意见？谢谢已有3人参与

Your paper was carefully reviewed by the authorized reviewers of the IEEJ Transactions. Result is C (Reevaluation after Referral). Please note that you are requested to respond to all comments by the reviewers when you resubmit the paper.
The inquiries and comments are as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

[Reviewer "A"] Result = B(Conditional Acceptance)
[Reviewer "D"] Result = D(Reject)

------------------------------------------
Reviewer A

You should take a restraint characteristics of current differential protection relay into consideration to show that this paper is useful.

------------------------------------------
Reviewer D

This paper presents the capacitive current compensation that affects the sensitivity of the current differential protection relay under the complex four transmission lines on the same tower. However, this method is only calculate the symmetrical components of capacitive currents in various cases, it is easy to derive the compensation current under the given capacitance parameters. The simulation is also only a circuit calculation under the conditions of the given capacitance values, and it does not indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Hence, this paper is in an insufficient state at the point of the originality and impact to the field. Therefore, my judgement is D.

-P.4 Line 9 and 19: The description of "equation (13)" seems to be "equation (9)".
-Chap 4 Fig.5-Fig.13, Table 1: Since the detail simulation conditions are unknown, the validity of the results are not clear. Furthermore, the legend of the graph overlaps on the lines, the results are unknown.
-P.7 Table1: It is not clear which column of "Compensated on four circuit" is on operation mode M2.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？已经有10人回复
推荐一本书已经有12人回复
基金申报已经有4人回复
计算机、0854电子信息（085401-058412）调剂已经有4人回复
溴的反应液脱色已经有6人回复
纳米粒子粒径的测量已经有7人回复
常年博士招收(双一流，工科) 已经有4人回复
参与限项已经有5人回复
有没有人能给点建议已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求已经有12人回复

1楼 2016-12-26 12:04:25

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

crest_2008

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 11 (小学生)
金币: 1013.8
散金: 538
红花: 4
帖子: 570
在线: 65.6小时
虫号: 607334
注册: 2008-09-19
性别: GG
专业: 集成电路设计与测试

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
tang410(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2016-12-26 14:39:00
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-28 09:47:57
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-30 09:03:13

两个reviewer其实都是对你论文的创新性、有用性有问题。reviewer D的建议感觉还是比较客观的。如果你觉得是他理解错了，没有领会你文章的内容。那么就要再仔细看看自己的文章是不是有不足或者表述模糊的地方。
再仔细改改，明确下文章的亮点，文章让别人看起来有理有据，还是有希望的。
加油！