| 查看: 3989 | 回复: 9 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
tang410新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
两个审稿意见差别大，重投后接收的希望大不？如何回复意见？谢谢 已有3人参与
|
|
|
Your paper was carefully reviewed by the authorized reviewers of the IEEJ Transactions. Result is C (Reevaluation after Referral). Please note that you are requested to respond to all comments by the reviewers when you resubmit the paper. The inquiries and comments are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------- [Reviewer "A"] Result = B(Conditional Acceptance) [Reviewer "D"] Result = D(Reject) ------------------------------------------ Reviewer A You should take a restraint characteristics of current differential protection relay into consideration to show that this paper is useful. ------------------------------------------ Reviewer D This paper presents the capacitive current compensation that affects the sensitivity of the current differential protection relay under the complex four transmission lines on the same tower. However, this method is only calculate the symmetrical components of capacitive currents in various cases, it is easy to derive the compensation current under the given capacitance parameters. The simulation is also only a circuit calculation under the conditions of the given capacitance values, and it does not indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Hence, this paper is in an insufficient state at the point of the originality and impact to the field. Therefore, my judgement is D. -P.4 Line 9 and 19: The description of "equation (13)" seems to be "equation (9)". -Chap 4 Fig.5-Fig.13, Table 1: Since the detail simulation conditions are unknown, the validity of the results are not clear. Furthermore, the legend of the graph overlaps on the lines, the results are unknown. -P.7 Table1: It is not clear which column of "Compensated on four circuit" is on operation mode M2. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有69人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有23人回复
-
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有12人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有13人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有7人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有13人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有8人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有22人回复
CynthiaH0514
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1300.4
- 散金: 6
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 253
- 在线: 76.7小时
- 虫号: 3373639
- 注册: 2014-08-19
- 专业: 自动化
送红花一朵 
9楼2017-07-19 16:31:34
crest_2008
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 1013.8
- 散金: 538
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 570
- 在线: 65.6小时
- 虫号: 607334
- 注册: 2008-09-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
tang410(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2016-12-26 14:39:00
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-28 09:47:57
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-30 09:03:13
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
tang410(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2016-12-26 14:39:00
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-28 09:47:57
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-30 09:03:13
|
两个reviewer其实都是对你论文的创新性、有用性有问题。reviewer D的建议感觉还是比较客观的。如果你觉得是他理解错了，没有领会你文章的内容。那么就要再仔细看看自己的文章是不是有不足或者表述模糊的地方。 再仔细改改，明确下文章的亮点，文章让别人看起来有理有据，还是有希望的。 加油！ |
2楼2016-12-26 13:14:11
tiffany123
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2764.1
- 红花: 11
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 2820
- 在线: 86.7小时
- 虫号: 5224138
- 注册: 2016-11-11
- 专业: 食品科学基础
3楼2016-12-26 13:41:00
4楼2017-01-07 19:29:28
