| 查看: 3540 | 回复: 9 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
tang410新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
两个审稿意见差别大，重投后接收的希望大不？如何回复意见？谢谢 已有3人参与
|
|
|
Your paper was carefully reviewed by the authorized reviewers of the IEEJ Transactions. Result is C (Reevaluation after Referral). Please note that you are requested to respond to all comments by the reviewers when you resubmit the paper. The inquiries and comments are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------- [Reviewer "A"] Result = B(Conditional Acceptance) [Reviewer "D"] Result = D(Reject) ------------------------------------------ Reviewer A You should take a restraint characteristics of current differential protection relay into consideration to show that this paper is useful. ------------------------------------------ Reviewer D This paper presents the capacitive current compensation that affects the sensitivity of the current differential protection relay under the complex four transmission lines on the same tower. However, this method is only calculate the symmetrical components of capacitive currents in various cases, it is easy to derive the compensation current under the given capacitance parameters. The simulation is also only a circuit calculation under the conditions of the given capacitance values, and it does not indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Hence, this paper is in an insufficient state at the point of the originality and impact to the field. Therefore, my judgement is D. -P.4 Line 9 and 19: The description of "equation (13)" seems to be "equation (9)". -Chap 4 Fig.5-Fig.13, Table 1: Since the detail simulation conditions are unknown, the validity of the results are not clear. Furthermore, the legend of the graph overlaps on the lines, the results are unknown. -P.7 Table1: It is not clear which column of "Compensated on four circuit" is on operation mode M2. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
限项规定
已经有6人回复
-
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向
已经有3人回复
-
救命帖
已经有6人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有37人回复
-
英文综述是否需要润色及查重
已经有5人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复
-
招博士
已经有3人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
CynthiaH0514
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1300.4
- 散金: 6
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 253
- 在线: 76.7小时
- 虫号: 3373639
- 注册: 2014-08-19
- 专业: 自动化
送红花一朵 
9楼2017-07-19 16:31:34
crest_2008
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 1013.8
- 散金: 538
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 570
- 在线: 65.6小时
- 虫号: 607334
- 注册: 2008-09-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
tang410(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2016-12-26 14:39:00
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-28 09:47:57
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-30 09:03:13
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
tang410(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2016-12-26 14:39:00
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-28 09:47:57
tang410: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-12-30 09:03:13
|
两个reviewer其实都是对你论文的创新性、有用性有问题。reviewer D的建议感觉还是比较客观的。如果你觉得是他理解错了，没有领会你文章的内容。那么就要再仔细看看自己的文章是不是有不足或者表述模糊的地方。 再仔细改改，明确下文章的亮点，文章让别人看起来有理有据，还是有希望的。 加油！ |
2楼2016-12-26 13:14:11
tiffany123
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2764.1
- 红花: 11
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 2820
- 在线: 86.7小时
- 虫号: 5224138
- 注册: 2016-11-11
- 专业: 食品科学基础
3楼2016-12-26 13:41:00
4楼2017-01-07 19:29:28