投稿一个月被拒，最后两句意见看不懂？
An?initial?review?of?"xxx",?and?overall?resource??limitations,has?made?it?clear?that?the?technical?content?and?novelty?are?not?competitiveto?proceed?with?the?full?review?process?in?Ad?Hoc?&?Sensor?Wireless
Networks.
The?paper?dos?not?include?a?related?work?section.?Moreover,?the?proposalshould?be?proposal?with?other?published?proposals.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
意见An?initial?review?of?”XXX",?and?overall?resource??limitations,
has?made?it?clear?that?the?technical?content?and?novelty?are?not?competitive
to?proceed?with?the?full?review?process?in?Ad?Hoc?&?Sensor?Wireless
Networks.
The?paper?dos?not?include?a?related?work?section.?Moreover,?the?proposal
should?be?proposal?with?other?published?proposals.
怎么全是问号
最后两句话是:the paper does not include a related work section.Moreover,the proposal should be proposal with other published propaosals
与相关工作进行比较分析，一般写在讨论部分
完整的意见:An initial review of ”XXX",?and overall resource limitations,
has made it clear that the technical content and novelty are not competitive
to proceed with the full review process in Ad Hoc & Sensor Wireless
Networks.
The paper dos not include a related work section. Moreover, the proposal
should be proposal with other published proposals.
，