rare metals 投稿返回，编辑要求大修，只提供了审稿人意见，第二个人的意见很难满足，请教这样comments算什么样呀，还是第一次投sci。

>Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which can be found below, and submit a list of responses to the comments.

>Reviewer #2: Although the work lacks scientific depth, the model proposed can be useful as an input for future deformation analysis of the experimental alloy. This makes the work worth publishing. Before publication however please consider the following points:
********************************
>
>Reviewer 3: This paper presents a ************* model based on ********************* to predict *******************. But unfortunately, the authors did not explain why the new model is better than the other models. The authors should focus on the physical nature of the model to show the novelty of the paper. In addition, if possible, the reviewer hope the authors use their own experimental data to verify the model. Therefore, it is recommended to revise the manuscript. 返回小木虫查看更多