24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 876  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者autumnfall将赠送您 5 个金币

autumnfall

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] rare metals 投稿返回大修,请教下已有1人参与

rare metals 投稿返回,编辑要求大修,只提供了审稿人意见,第二个人的意见很难满足,请教这样comments算什么样呀,还是第一次投sci。

>Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which can be found below, and submit a list of responses to the comments.

>Reviewer #2: Although the work lacks scientific depth, the model proposed can be useful as an input for future deformation analysis of the experimental alloy. This makes the work worth publishing. Before publication however please consider the following points:
********************************
>
>Reviewer 3: This paper presents a ************* model based on ********************* to predict *******************. But unfortunately, the authors did not explain why the new model is better than the other models. The authors should focus on the physical nature of the model to show the novelty of the paper. In addition, if possible, the reviewer hope the authors use their own experimental data to verify the model. Therefore, it is recommended to revise the manuscript.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
第二个审稿人说楼主的文章虽然缺乏理论深度,但介绍的模型具有实用价值,值得发表。总的来说审稿意见是比较正面的。
咱也是有组织的人了...
2楼2016-12-09 23:10:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

程小星

新虫 (正式写手)

三个审稿人意见都比较正面,楼主认真修改并一一response应该问题不大

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2016-12-10 00:00:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mxnjfu

新虫 (知名作家)

4楼2016-12-10 00:23:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 autumnfall 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见