24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者autumnfall将赠送您 5 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

autumnfall

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 57
帖子: 3
在线: 2小时
虫号: 3202998
注册: 2014-05-13
专业: 金属结构材料

[求助] rare metals 投稿返回大修，请教下已有1人参与

rare metals 投稿返回，编辑要求大修，只提供了审稿人意见，第二个人的意见很难满足，请教这样comments算什么样呀，还是第一次投sci。

>Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which can be found below, and submit a list of responses to the comments.

>Reviewer #2: Although the work lacks scientific depth, the model proposed can be useful as an input for future deformation analysis of the experimental alloy. This makes the work worth publishing. Before publication however please consider the following points:
********************************
>
>Reviewer 3: This paper presents a ************* model based on ********************* to predict *******************. But unfortunately, the authors did not explain why the new model is better than the other models. The authors should focus on the physical nature of the model to show the novelty of the paper. In addition, if possible, the reviewer hope the authors use their own experimental data to verify the model. Therefore, it is recommended to revise the manuscript.

回复此楼