当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >大家帮忙看看ABC编辑给我的稿件回复--这样的情况是不是就是彻底没戏了,要换杂志么?

大家帮忙看看ABC编辑给我的稿件回复--这样的情况是不是就是彻底没戏了,要换杂志么?

作者 cy211
来源: 小木虫 2000 40 举报帖子
+关注

Dear Dr.
We regret to inform you that on the basis of the reports and comments received from the referee, the Editor, Prof. Emily Hilder, is unable to accept the above-mentioned manuscript for publication in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

The comments of the referee are given below for your consideration. We hope the information provided by the referee will be helpful in understanding the Editor's decision. On behalf of the Journal, we thank you for submitting your manuscript and hope that the outcome of this specific review will not discourage you from sending future papers to us.


Comments on your submitted manuscript:

1) Editor Comments:

This manuscript is rejected from publication in this journal, based on the review received and my own assessment of this manuscript.

The MIP material prepared shows good selectivity for the target analyte over interfering analytes with similar structure. However the critical issue is the very high non-specific absorption that is observed for this material. This means that the analytical utility of this technique is not clear. If the authors could address this aspect and demonstrate the performance of this material for the analysis of the target analyte in fruit, with interfering species present, then a new submission on this topic could be considered. Such a submission would also require data included that shows comparison of this technique with existing methods, demonstrating where this offers better performance.

求助大家编辑的话是不是就是测定据稿了!没戏了!要换杂志么? 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • cy211

    自己再顶一下,求助大家帮助!

  • paperhunter

    引用回帖:
    10楼: Originally posted by cy211 at 2016-09-29 23:36:09
    您好,非常感谢你的回复,我现在也很纠结,是好好修改继续投这个杂志还是转投PLOS ONE,我现在最担心的就是时间!您给点建议吧!
    ...

    是否再投要看是否能够令人信服地回答编辑和审稿人提出的问题,并作出到位的修改。

  • zqx304218731

    编辑意思是如果补充相关数据还是可以重新投稿的~

    请问楼主是多久收到评审意见的呢?

  • cy211

    引用回帖:
    13楼: Originally posted by zqx304218731 at 2016-09-30 16:12:48
    编辑意思是如果补充相关数据还是可以重新投稿的~

    请问楼主是多久收到评审意见的呢?

    别提了,可闹心了,一共62天,第62天我发信问了一下,昨天就给我消息说据稿了!别人推荐的杂志,说听快的,没想到,哎!太慢了!

    那你说编辑的意思是不是我改好的,还是可以重新投稿的,是吧,不是彻底否定吧?

  • cy211

    引用回帖:
    12楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2016-09-30 09:29:59
    是否再投要看是否能够令人信服地回答编辑和审稿人提出的问题,并作出到位的修改。...

    因为我们要考评,还有3个月的时间,我不知道该好好修改继续投ABC,还是换成PLOS ONE ,您觉得哪个更快一些?

  • zqx304218731

    引用回帖:
    14楼: Originally posted by cy211 at 2016-09-30 16:18:22
    别提了,可闹心了,一共62天,第62天我发信问了一下,昨天就给我消息说据稿了!别人推荐的杂志,说听快的,没想到,哎!太慢了!

    那你说编辑的意思是不是我改好的,还是可以重新投稿的,是吧,不是彻底否定吧?...

    这么长时间啊,之前一直是under review吗?

    目前这篇稿件是拒稿,但编辑没有说这个内容不要再投该期刊,而是说按照意见修改和补充相应的数据后可以重新进行投稿,如果改的好希望应该挺大。个人理解仅供参考哈~

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓