主编以文章太长建议改投别处全文为理由拒稿,这种情况压缩重投有戏吗?
前几天投了篇Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 当天就被主编拒回来了。理由是文章太长,而且他觉得不太好压缩到合适的篇幅,建议改投别处的全文。没有提内容方面的问题。
想请教下各位虫友,你们遇到过这种情况吗?还有这种情况下,我如果把文章中内容压缩到合适篇幅重投Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,可能有戏吗?
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
前几天投了篇Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 当天就被主编拒回来了。理由是文章太长,而且他觉得不太好压缩到合适的篇幅,建议改投别处的全文。没有提内容方面的问题。
想请教下各位虫友,你们遇到过这种情况吗?还有这种情况下,我如果把文章中内容压缩到合适篇幅重投Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,可能有戏吗?
返回小木虫查看更多
试试就有50%的希望,一切皆有可能。
主编认为有问题不好办
可以试着挪些材料进si
可以改主题拆2篇?选题要好
如果创新不发,不要故意写这么长,编辑不会喜欢长文。
那这种情况下重投的话要额外给主编附一封信吗?如果要的话该写些什么呢?
Dear Professor ??,
Thank you for the above-mentioned manuscript that you have submitted for publication as a Communication in Angewandte Chemie. Our journal has a growing but still limited number of editorial pages per year, and every year we receive more manuscripts. We therefore have to ask our authors to prepare their manuscripts in keeping with the guidelines given in our Notice to Authors (see https://www.angewandte.org). This applies to the formal presentation of all parts of the manuscript and especially to its length. For example, introductions should be kept concise and place the work in context to what is actually reported. Please shorten your manuscript to a maximum of about 15000 characters (including references, tables, legends to figures, etc.; see Notice to Authors; additional information can be placed in the Supporting Information). Graphical material is counted separately but should also be used economically.
根据我投稿的经历,大概要求所有文字大约15000字。祝楼主好运!楼主可以跟编辑说,根据您的意见,我们将文章的内容缩减到15000字以下,并认真组织了文章的结构。我们希望您能再次考虑以下我们的文章。巴拉巴拉,有如下新意,
十分感谢你认真细致的回答。我的情况是文章里的图可能有点多,文字不到15000字,可能是图片占用了太多篇幅。这种情况是不是就只能删图片了?
没戏,,这种属于妙拒了