第一篇SCI，投了10天开始审，审了30天结束，一天等决定，一天后结果出来了，共花费44天，这期刊一般3-4月。
那么问题来了，两个审稿人，编辑把其他文章的审稿意见给我了，第二个审稿人的意见是对的，咋弄?
还有就是编辑的回答感觉没见出要拒还是收。第二个审稿人的意见倒是少就三个，也没明确说要收还是拒，麻烦帮忙看一下。
编辑：
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Annals of Nuclear Energy. We have completed the review of your manuscript. A summary is appended below. While revising the paper please consider the reviewers' comments carefully. We look forward to receiving your detailed response and your revised manuscript.
XXXX
I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
审稿人2：
Deep penetration problem is the key problem of radiation shielding design. Generally, it can be resolved by variance reduction, Monte Carlo – deterministic coupled method, etc. In this paper, a new global variance reduction (GVR) method is proposed. A better simulation efficiency is verified by the NESDIP-2 benchmark. This work is significant, but there are some problems as following:
1：...
2：...
3：... 返回小木虫查看更多