投稿Industrial crops and products, 状态with editor下3个月，终于来了意见。结果意见是：
Dear Dr. ***,
Thank you for submitting the above-mentioned article to Industrial Crops and Products.
Unfortunately, we cannot pass on your manuscript to peer reviewers, since the following items are missing:
1. Log into the Elsevier Editorial System for Industrial Crops and Products as an Author:https://ees.elsevier.com/
Your username is: *****
2.  Locate INDCRO-D-16-01*** in your 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.
3. Check the "File Inventory" to ensure that all of the required items are included:
*Highlights (where applicable)
Highlights are mandatory. They consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See   https://www.elsevier.com/highlights for examples.
4. Submit your revised paper by clicking 'Submit Revision' and completing the submission steps.
Note: Be sure to include a separate document uploaded as "Response to Reviewers" that carefully addresses, point-by-point, the issues raised in this letter (i.e. "My paper now includes Highlights and source files." ).
We once again thank you for your contribution to Industrial Crops and Products and look forward to publishing your work.
由于第一次投时，我没有写highlights。我修改加上highlights，然后再提交。过几天，结果又回来了，意见跟上面一次是完全是一样。我以为格式问题，再修改，再提交。过几天，编辑回复的意见还是跟原来一模一样。后来，我发现我的highlights有个句子超过85个字符，然后我再修改至少于85个字符。再提交，结果几天后的回复意见还是一样。
反复总共4次，修改意见还是一样。那么是什么原因呢？编辑的意思是什么呢？我的highlights写得不够core?
注：我的highlight总共有4个句子，每个句子都不超过85个字符。 返回小木虫查看更多