前段时间投了篇RSC advance，三个审稿人，两个小修，一个拒稿（说是工作没有意见，5个方面全是NO），结果编辑给了大修。重新加数据，返修后。编辑应该把修改稿返给了拒稿的审稿人，结果审稿人说没有新的创意，还是拒稿（5个方面还是全是NO）。结果是编辑还是让大修。自己都没信心了，不想改了，自己也不会改了。审稿人这次没提出具体的修改内容。撤稿如何？换投其他的杂志。折磨的几天睡不着。
Additional Questions:
Does the work significantly advance the understanding or development in this field? : No
Are the conclusions of the work convincing and sufficiently supported by experimental evidence?: No
Is the experimental section sufficiently detailed to allow others to reproduce the work?: No
Are the reported claims adequately discussed in the context of the literature?: No
Are the number of tables and figures in the manuscript appropriate and clear?: No 返回小木虫查看更多