接不接受审稿，首先得看文章内容是否在你的审稿能力之内啊，不要纠结是否审稿对你本人投稿是否有影响，因为在外国人那里，这完全是两码事，不会存在“报复”心理～

接受呀，这是好事。你要是拒了，可能就不好了。不过要审稿的话，记住一定要负责，给编辑留下一个好印象！

接受啊，相当于锻炼下自己

如果从没审过，可以审一下。

HOW TO WRITE A REVIEWER REPORT
https://journals.jsap.jp/wp-cont ... o_write_rev_rep.pdf

How to assess the paper quality
• Is the work understandable, correct, and appropriate for the journal?
– What are the purpose of and problems to solve in the work? Are they clearly stated?
– Is the purpose or goal of the work within the journal’s scope?
– Is the work correct and free of obvious errors?
– Are the methods and techniques employed appropriate? Is the mathematics correct?

• Is the work original and interesting?
– Is the work original and does it contain new results that significantly advance the research field, or does it show only incremental advance over prior research results?
– Have any parts of the paper already been published or considered for other publication?
– Are the results interesting and important to researchers in relevant fields of applied physics?
Is this paper likely to be cited in the future?
– Is the paper scientifically sound and not misleading? Does it provide sufficient information
and in-depth discussion?
– Is the presentation complete for a scientific paper? Is there any critical information missing?
• Is the presentation satisfactory?
– Is the paper well written enough for evaluation of technical content?
– Does the title reflect the contents of the paper?
– Does the abstract describe the essential information in the work?
– Does the introductory section adequately explain the framework and problems of the
research? Are the importance and usefulness of this research work clear?
– Are sufficient references cited for providing a background to the research? (30 references
for JJAP Regular Papers and 20 references for APEX Letters and JJAP Rapid
Communications are recommended.)
– Is the length and format of the paper appropriate?
– Is the conclusion logically supported by the obtained results?
– Are the figures and tables easily readable, correct and informative?
– Is the English understandable? Is the paper free of typographical and grammatical errors，