24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 6644  |  回复: 36

penglu0123

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

[求助] 在投的国外杂志邀请我作审稿人 我应该接受吗 已有9人参与

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

学术杂谈

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

dayangshi2b

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
penglu0123: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-08-10 10:33:32
接不接受审稿,首先得看文章内容是否在你的审稿能力之内啊,不要纠结是否审稿对你本人投稿是否有影响,因为在外国人那里,这完全是两码事,不会存在“报复”心理~

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
善于帮助别人,别人才能帮助自己!
9楼2016-08-10 09:30:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aboluo198331

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
接受呀,这是好事。你要是拒了,可能就不好了。不过要审稿的话,记住一定要负责,给编辑留下一个好印象!
11楼2016-08-10 10:03:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

godtornado

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
penglu0123: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2016-08-10 15:11:32
赶紧接受啊,这是好事,认真审稿即可
17楼2016-08-10 13:12:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

八戒的小弟

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

二师兄退休了

优秀版主优秀版主

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by penglu0123 at 2016-08-10 06:45:16
审稿对于我自身有什么益处吗
...

你的论文别人审稿,别人也什么好处吗
4楼2016-08-10 06:46:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

FMStation

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
HOW TO WRITE A REVIEWER REPORT
https://journals.jsap.jp/wp-cont ... o_write_rev_rep.pdf

How to assess the paper quality
• Is the work understandable, correct, and appropriate for the journal?
– What are the purpose of and problems to solve in the work? Are they clearly stated?
– Is the purpose or goal of the work within the journal’s scope?
– Is the work correct and free of obvious errors?
– Are the methods and techniques employed appropriate? Is the mathematics correct?

• Is the work original and interesting?
– Is the work original and does it contain new results that significantly advance the research field, or does it show only incremental advance over prior research results?
– Have any parts of the paper already been published or considered for other publication?
– Are the results interesting and important to researchers in relevant fields of applied physics?
Is this paper likely to be cited in the future?
– Is the paper scientifically sound and not misleading? Does it provide sufficient information
and in-depth discussion?
– Is the presentation complete for a scientific paper? Is there any critical information missing?
• Is the presentation satisfactory?
– Is the paper well written enough for evaluation of technical content?
– Does the title reflect the contents of the paper?
– Does the abstract describe the essential information in the work?
– Does the introductory section adequately explain the framework and problems of the
research? Are the importance and usefulness of this research work clear?
– Are sufficient references cited for providing a background to the research? (30 references
for JJAP Regular Papers and 20 references for APEX Letters and JJAP Rapid
Communications are recommended.)
– Is the length and format of the paper appropriate?
– Is the conclusion logically supported by the obtained results?
– Are the figures and tables easily readable, correct and informative?
– Is the English understandable? Is the paper free of typographical and grammatical errors?
16楼2016-08-10 11:00:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)

本帖仅楼主可见
2楼2016-08-10 06:27:13
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

penglu0123

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 大东 at 2016-08-10 06:27:13
接受啊

审稿对于我自身有什么益处吗

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2016-08-10 06:45:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

penglu0123

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 八戒的小弟 at 2016-08-10 06:46:38
你的论文别人审稿,别人也什么好处吗...

您说的很对 我只是担心自己水平不够

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2016-08-10 06:51:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lp20094479

铁虫 (小有名气)


penglu0123(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-08-10 09:12:18
接受吧,至少你在审稿时会比平时更认真地看文献,如果以后走科研道路,迟早都要去审别人的稿子
好好学习,天天向上
6楼2016-08-10 07:25:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

penglu0123

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by lp20094479 at 2016-08-10 07:25:13
接受吧,至少你在审稿时会比平时更认真地看文献,如果以后走科研道路,迟早都要去审别人的稿子

好的 谢谢

发自小木虫IOS客户端
7楼2016-08-10 07:27:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
8楼2016-08-10 08:17:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

penglu0123

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by dayangshi2b at 2016-08-10 09:30:35
接不接受审稿,首先得看文章内容是否在你的审稿能力之内啊,不要纠结是否审稿对你本人投稿是否有影响,因为在外国人那里,这完全是两码事,不会存在“报复”心理~
...

好的谢谢 确实和我的研究方向相同 审稿还是可以的

发自小木虫IOS客户端
10楼2016-08-10 09:40:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 penglu0123 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 302分求调剂 +9 凡语祈愿 2026-04-08 10/500 2026-04-10 23:26 by 314126402
[考研] 263能源动力专硕求调剂 +3 加大号饭盒袋 2026-04-10 3/150 2026-04-10 22:23 by 286640313
[考研] 计算机类求调剂,22408-274分 +7 上岸de小虫 2026-04-09 8/400 2026-04-10 19:56 by fxue1114
[考研] 求调剂 +3 电气300求调剂不 2026-04-08 3/150 2026-04-10 10:19 by LHGeng
[考研] 材料专硕初试分332一志愿西北工业大学, +12 故人?? 2026-04-09 12/600 2026-04-09 18:34 by Ccclqqq
[考研] 322求调剂,08工科 +3 今天是个小号 2026-04-08 3/150 2026-04-09 15:53 by wp06
[考博] 材料方向考博,求推荐 +3 言语aaa 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-08 22:22 by nxgogo
[考研] 一志愿南昌大学,085600,344分求调剂 +11 调剂上岸玘 2026-04-05 12/600 2026-04-08 16:17 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 274求调剂求调剂 +10 Jachenbingoo 2026-04-06 13/650 2026-04-08 14:25 by zhq0425
[考研] 机械工程264学硕求调剂 +3 qiushangxian 2026-04-06 3/150 2026-04-08 01:53 by Linzejun
[考研] 材料求调剂 +18 一样YWY 2026-04-05 18/900 2026-04-07 15:49 by dxlg
[考研] 372分材料与化工(085600)英二数二求调剂 +4 蓝笺片 2026-04-06 4/200 2026-04-07 12:30 by dongzh2009
[考研] 软工学硕299求调剂 +6 useryy 2026-04-07 6/300 2026-04-07 09:50 by vgtyfty
[考研] 工科 22408 267求推荐 +4 wanwan00 2026-04-05 5/250 2026-04-06 22:47 by chenzhimin
[考研] 304求调剂 +4 luoye0105 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-06 21:05 by 木子君1218
[考研] 一志愿北交大材料工程总分358求调剂 +10 cs0106 2026-04-05 12/600 2026-04-06 19:41 by 无际的草原
[考研] 复试调剂 +5 asdasdassda 2026-04-05 5/250 2026-04-06 09:32 by dongzh2009
[考研] 材料调剂 +14 壹贰贰亿 2026-04-04 14/700 2026-04-05 23:31 by 来看流星雨10
[考研] 277求调剂 +5 考研调剂lxh 2026-04-05 5/250 2026-04-05 19:03 by chy09050039
[考研] 288求调剂,一志愿华南理工大学071005 +6 ioodiiij 2026-04-04 6/300 2026-04-05 10:09 by guoweigw
信息提示
请填处理意见